Botic van de Zandschulp vs Jiri LeheckaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Botic van de Zandschulp and Jiri Lehecka have met 3 times since 2021; Jiri Lehecka leads 2–1. Their first meeting came at Poznan Challenger in 2021 on clay. On hard courts they are level 1–1. Across all meetings Zandschulp has taken 3 sets to Lehecka's 4. Their most recent meeting: Botic van de Zandschulp won at Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel (2025).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | van de Zandschulp | Lehecka | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Botic van de Zandschulp | Jiri Lehecka | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 71% | 20/28 | 66% | 21/32 |
| Wins a set when losing | 44% | 11/25 | 33% | 6/18 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 36% | 19/53 | 34% | 17/50 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 52% | 13/25 | 44% | 15/34 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 70% | 16/23 | 54% | 7/13 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 57% | 13/23 | 56% | 15/27 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 79% | 22/28 | 87% | 27/31 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 71% | 20/28 | 68% | 21/31 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 3 completed meetings ended in straight sets (van de Zandschulp 1, Lehecka 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zandschulp
💥 Big Hitter
Lehecka
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 4,932 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
3 career meetings, newest first
Oct 22, 2025
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel
H Hard · 1st Round
Feb 10, 2022
ABN AMRO World Tennis Tournament - Rotterdam
H Hard · 2nd Round
Jul 30, 2021
Poznan Challenger
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Zandschulp | Lehecka | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Botic van de Zandschulp | Jiri Lehecka | ||
| 1 or more | 91% | 19/21 | 100% | 15/15 |
| 3 or more | 76% | 16/21 | 93% | 14/15 |
| 5 or more | 57% | 12/21 | 73% | 11/15 |
| 10 or more | 29% | 6/21 | 40% | 6/15 |
| 15 or more | 14% | 3/21 | 7% | 1/15 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/21 | 0% | 0/15 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zandschulp | Lehecka |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 15–7 | 12–5 |
| Avg odds | 2.23 | 1.71 |
| ROI % | +30.4% | +6.3% |
| Units P/L | +6.70u | +1.08u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Zandschulp | Lehecka |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 2 |
| Events | 3 | 2 |
| Matches | 6 | 6 |
| Distance | 1,611 mi · 2,592 km | 1,092 mi · 1,758 km |
| Route | CHN | JPN → CHN |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 10 shared opponents, both Zandschulp and Lehecka posted a 70% win rate.
| Opponent | Zandschulp | Lehecka |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Michelsen | W 64 64 | W 64 62 |
| Adolfo Daniel Vallejo | W 62 60 | W 61 61 |
| Ugo Humbert | L 36 46 | W 57 64 64 |
| Zizou Bergs | W 36 76 46 76 63 | W 63 67 63 |
| Alexander Zverev | L 26 57 16 | L 46 57 63 67 |
| Arthur Gea | W 36 67 76 76 64 | L 57 67 57 |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | W 64 76 | L 62 16 67 16 |
| Pablo Carreno Busta | L 36 26 | W 61 76 46 62 |
| Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard | W 62 36 63 | W 76 76 |
| Jan-Lennard Struff | W 63 16 61 | W 76 63 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Alex Michelsen
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 2nd Round
Oct 10
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 1st Round
Oct 8
Francisco Cerundolo
China Open - Beijing · 1st Round
Oct 1
Jie Cui
China Open - Beijing · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 29
Valentin Royer
China Open - Beijing · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Chengdu Open - Chengdu · 2nd Round
Sep 25
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, NED-COL 4-0 · Rubber 1
Sep 18
Alexander Zverev
U.S. Open - New York · Quarterfinals
Sep 10
Nuno Borges
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 2nd Round
Oct 10
Carlos Alcaraz
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo · Final
Oct 6
Valentin Vacherot
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo · Semifinals
Oct 5
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo · Quarterfinals
Oct 4
Ugo Humbert
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo · 2nd Round
Oct 3
Zizou Bergs
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo · 1st Round
Oct 1
Learner Tien
Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, CZE-USA · Rubber 5
Sep 19
Ben Shelton
Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, CZE-USA · Rubber 2
Sep 18
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 59–64 matches
| Metric | Zandschulp | Lehecka |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 55% | 63% |
| Sets won | 54% | 59% |
| Games won | 51% | 53% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Zandschulp | Lehecka |
|---|---|---|
| ATP 500 | 1 | 1 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Zandschulp | Lehecka |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 1 |
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.