Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Jan ChoinskiPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Botic van de Zandschulp and Jan Choinski have met 2 times since 2018; Botic van de Zandschulp leads 2โ€“0. Their first meeting came at Scheveningen in 2018 on clay. On clay courts Zandschulp leads 2โ€“0. Zandschulp has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Zandschulp has taken 4 sets to Choinski's 0. Their most recent meeting: Botic van de Zandschulp won at Braunschweig Challenger (2025).

Upcoming match

Tournament
U.S. Open - New York
Level
Grand Slam
Round
1st Round
Surface
Hard
Date & time
September 1 ยท 4:00 PM ET

Book odds

Jan Choinski3.403.90
Botic van de Zandschulp1.321.25

Set spread

Choinski -1.55.28
van de Zandschulp +1.51.13

Game spread

Choinski +51.93
van de Zandschulp -51.79
ChoinskiClay-court specialist (66%)van de ZandschulpHard-court specialist (60%)

Record at prices like this

Jan Choinski3.9024% fairWon 0%

Priced around 3.90 or longer, Jan Choinski has won 0 of 12 matches, 0% against a fair-price expectation of 18%.

Botic van de Zandschulp1.2576% fairWon 86%

Priced around 1.25 or shorter, Botic van de Zandschulp has won 37 of 43 matches, 86% against a fair-price expectation of 81%.

Book prices only, with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Sample sizes below ten are not shown.

Botic van de Zandschulp and Jan Choinski meet next at the U.S. Open - New York on September 1 on hard.

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

Indicatorvan de ZandschulpChoinski
Wins in straight sets80%56%
Wins a set when losing41%39%
Goes to a deciding set31%42%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favorite57%43%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog61%77%
Tiebreak sets won48%48%
Wins after taking set 181%92%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 174%75%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (van de Zandschulp 2, Choinski 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Zandschulp

๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Choinski

๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

Both Botic van de Zandschulp and Jan Choinski are ๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 2,644 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Jul 8, 2025

Braunschweig Challenger

C Clay ยท 1st Round

61
60
Zandschulp

Jul 9, 2018

Scheveningen

C Clay ยท Round of 32

75
62
Zandschulp

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets ยท Last 90 days

OutcomeZandschulpChoinski
1 or more93%100%
3 or more80%96%
5 or more47%71%
10 or more27%25%
15 or more13%7%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricZandschulpChoinski
W-L9โ€“718โ€“9
Avg odds2.291.90
ROI %+7.8%+5.7%
Units P/L+1.25u+1.53u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricZandschulpChoinski
Countries23
Events34
Matches95
Distance1,024 mi ยท 1,648 km5,992 mi ยท 9,643 km
RouteCAN โ†’ USAGER โ†’ USA โ†’ CAN โ†’ USA

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced ยท Last 12 months

Zandschulp has a higher win rate against shared opponents (63% vs Choinski's 13%).

OpponentZandschulpChoinski
Taro Daniel
W
76
64
L
46
36
Thiago Agustin Tirante
W
64
63
L
67
76
67
Jakub Mensik
L
46
57
L
76
26
46
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
W
62
36
63
L
64
36
67
Roman Safiullin
L
06
64
36
63
67
L
26
36
Quentin Halys
L
16
02
W
16
63
76
Alexandre Muller
W
75
63
L
67
36
Marc-Andrea Huesler
W
76
63
L
46
64
46

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Zandschulp
LWWLWLWW
L

Benjamin Bonzi

Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem ยท Quarterfinals

657
46

Aug 27

W

Luciano Darderi

Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem ยท 3rd Round

61
60

Aug 26

W

Adolfo Daniel Vallejo

Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem ยท 2nd Round

62
60

Aug 25

L

Joao Fonseca

Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati ยท 2nd Round

46
627

Aug 16

W

Aleksandr Shevchenko

Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati ยท 1st Round

64
64

Aug 14

L

Jakub Mensik

National Bank Open - Montreal ยท 4th Round

46
57

Aug 10

W

Hubert Hurkacz

National Bank Open - Montreal ยท 3rd Round

36
764
75

Aug 7

W

Daniil Medvedev

National Bank Open - Montreal ยท 2nd Round

63
765

Aug 6

Choinski
LLLWWWWW
L

Mees Rottgering

Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem ยท 1st Round

57
62
46

Aug 24

L

Taro Daniel

Quebec City Challenger ยท 2nd Round

46
36

Aug 20

L

Thiago Agustin Tirante

Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati ยท 1st Round

697
767
647

Aug 13

W

Jamie Mackenzie

Bonn Challenger ยท Final

63
62

Aug 2

W

Federico Agustin Gomez

Bonn Challenger ยท Semifinals

64
62

Aug 1

W

Olle Wallin

Bonn Challenger ยท Quarterfinals

64
75

Jul 31

W

Alex Barrena

Bonn Challenger ยท 2nd Round

63
62

Jul 29

W

Francesco Passaro

Bonn Challenger ยท 1st Round

63
64

Jul 27

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

โ†‘ ZandschulpZandschulp aheadโ†“ Choinski

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 58โ€“78 matches

MetricZandschulpChoinski
Matches won48%63%
Sets won51%58%
Games won51%53%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageZandschulpChoinski
ATP Challenger Tour20

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceZandschulpChoinski
Clay20

Botic van de Zandschulp vs Jan Choinski FAQ

Botic van de Zandschulp leads the head-to-head 2โ€“0 over 2 meetings.