Bernard Tomic vs Jay ClarkePrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Bernard Tomic and Jay Clarke have met 4 times since 2018; they are level 2–2. Their first meeting came at Roland Garros in 2018 on clay. On clay courts Tomic leads 2–1. Across all meetings Tomic has taken 6 sets to Clarke's 4. Their most recent meeting: Jay Clarke won at Knoxville Challenger (2024).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Tomic | Clarke | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Bernard Tomic | Jay Clarke | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 58% | 19/33 | 64% | 25/39 |
| Wins a set when losing | 40% | 10/25 | 65% | 22/34 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 41% | 24/58 | 49% | 36/73 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 47% | 17/36 | 43% | 20/47 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 55% | 12/22 | 82% | 18/22 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 44% | 12/27 | 28% | 5/18 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 82% | 23/28 | 72% | 34/47 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 68% | 19/28 | 53% | 25/47 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Tomic 2, Clarke 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Tomic
🤖 Servebot
Clarke
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 3,438 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Bernard Tomic.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
4 career meetings, newest first
Nov 6, 2024
Knoxville Challenger
H Hard · 2nd Round
Aug 14, 2024
Santo Domingo Challenger
C Clay · 2nd Round
Apr 4, 2022
Mexico City Challenger
C Clay · 1st Round
May 27, 2018
Roland Garros
C Clay · 2nd Round Qualifying
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Tomic | Clarke | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Bernard Tomic | Jay Clarke | ||
| 1 or more | 96% | 22/23 | 94% | 16/17 |
| 3 or more | 83% | 19/23 | 41% | 7/17 |
| 5 or more | 74% | 17/23 | 6% | 1/17 |
| 10 or more | 35% | 8/23 | 0% | 0/17 |
| 15 or more | 4% | 1/23 | 0% | 0/17 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/23 | 0% | 0/17 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Tomic | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 17–7 | 9–8 |
| Avg odds | 1.90 | 1.99 |
| ROI % | +24.6% | -12.6% |
| Units P/L | +5.91u | -2.14u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Tomic | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 4 | 3 |
| Matches | 11 | 8 |
| Distance | 1,578 mi · 2,540 km | 553 mi · 890 km |
| Route | CHN | ITA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 9 shared opponents, both Tomic and Clarke posted a 44% win rate.
| Opponent | Tomic | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Binda | W 63 64 | W 64 64 |
| Masamichi Imamura | W 64 36 64 | L 26 46 |
| Tristan Boyer | L | W 76 63 |
| Darwin Blanch | W 64 67 63 | L 36 67 |
| Christopher O'Connell | L 46 46 | L 64 46 67 |
| Moez Echargui | W 36 75 63 | W 60 63 |
| Dane Sweeny | L 75 36 26 | W 62 62 |
| Borna Gojo | L 36 64 46 | L 16 46 |
| Antoine Ghibaudo | L 16 36 | L 62 26 57 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Matteo Arnaldi
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 1st Round
Oct 8
Timofey Skatov
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 6
Terence Atmane
Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 5
Yuta Shimizu
Jingshan Challenger · 2nd Round
Oct 2
Fajing Sun
Jingshan Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 29
Fajing Sun
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 23
Rigele Te
Hangzhou Open - Hangzhou · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 22
Pavel Kotov
Guangzhou Challenger · Semifinals
Sep 19
Gabriele Piraino
Palermo Challenger · 1st Round
Oct 6
Juan Cruz Martin Manzano
Bari Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 30
Fabrizio Andaloro
Bari Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 29
Carlo Alberto Caniato
Genoa 2 Challenger · Quarterfinals
Sep 25
Giuseppe La Vela
Genoa 2 Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 24
John Sperle
Genoa 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 22
Alejandro Moro Canas
Biella Challenger · Semifinals
Sep 19
Felix Gill
Biella Challenger · Quarterfinals
Sep 18
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 58–73 matches
| Metric | Tomic | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 57% | 53% |
| Sets won | 54% | 55% |
| Games won | 51% | 53% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Tomic | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam | 1 | 0 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 2 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Tomic | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
| Clay | 2 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.