ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Ostrava
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Piros
⚙️ Grinder
Kumstat
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 🪃 Counterpuncher is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Zsombor Piros plays Jan Kumstat.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Piros | Kumstat |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 12–6 | 1–1 |
| Avg odds | 1.61 | 2.27 |
| ROI % | -3.7% | -5.5% |
| Units P/L | -0.67u | -0.11u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Piros
0
Kumstat
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Kumstat has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Piros's 0%).
| Opponent | Piros | Kumstat |
|---|---|---|
| Marvin Moeller | L 36 67 | W |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Piros | Kumstat |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.4% | 65.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 67.6% | 67.3% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.2% | 50.5% |
| Aces / Match | 3.4 | 5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 1.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 61.1% | 65% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.9% | 28.7% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.4% | 54.2% |
| BP Converted % | 44.9% | 34.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.4 | 29.3 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28.7 | 30.7 |
| Net Pts Won % | 80% | 78.8% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50% | 49.8% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 65% | 67% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Zsombor Piros and Jan Kumstat face off in the Round of 16 at Ostrava on Clay.
Zsombor Piros leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Zsombor Piros is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Taro Daniel (Jun 12).
Jan Kumstat is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kai Wehnelt (Jun 18).
Share this match
