ATP Challenger Tour · 2nd Round Qualifying · Bratislava 2
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Piros
⚙️ Grinder
Gerasimov
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Egor Gerasimov here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Piros | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 12–6 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.61 | - |
| ROI % | -3.7% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.67u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Piros
1
Gerasimov
Oct 28, 2024
Bratislava 2
H Hard · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 22, 2022
Roland Garros
C Clay · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 8, 2019
Shymkent
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Piros | Gerasimov |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 67.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.2% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 3.4 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 61.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 44.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.4 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28.7 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 80% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Zsombor Piros and Egor Gerasimov face off in the 2nd Round Qualifying at Bratislava 2 on Hard.
Zsombor Piros leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Zsombor Piros is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Taro Daniel (Jun 12).
Egor Gerasimov is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Daniil Ostapenkov (Jan 12).
Share this match
