ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Karlsruhe
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Piros
⚙️ Grinder
Andreev
🧱 The Wall
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 54% vs 🧱 The Wall across 2,061 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Zsombor Piros here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the the wall's elite returner. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Piros | Andreev |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 12–6 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.61 | - |
| ROI % | -3.7% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.67u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Piros
0
Andreev
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Piros has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Andreev's 0%).
| Opponent | Piros | Andreev |
|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Moro Canas | W 46 63 64 | L 26 16 |
| Ivan Gakhov | W 76 63 | L 36 36 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Piros | Andreev |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 67.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.2% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 3.4 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 61.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 44.9% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.4 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28.7 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 80% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 65% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Zsombor Piros and Adrian Andreev face off in the Quarterfinals at Karlsruhe on Clay.
Zsombor Piros leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Zsombor Piros is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Taro Daniel (Jun 12).
Adrian Andreev is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sean Cuenin (Dec 29).
Share this match
