ATP Challenger Tour · Semifinals · Vilnius
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kolar
🪃 Counterpuncher
Ilkel
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs 👑 The Complete Package is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,062 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Zdenek Kolar plays Cem Ilkel.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kolar | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–10 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 1.64 | 3.61 |
| ROI % | -19.8% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -3.76u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Kolar
0
Ilkel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kolar | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 66.5% | 53.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 63.5% | 70.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.1% | 51.2% |
| Aces / Match | 2.7 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.9 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 55.3% | 71.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 36.7% | 41.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50.3% | 46.4% |
| BP Converted % | 47.6% | 100% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 20.8 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 36 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 58.6% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.2% | 53.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 50% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Zdenek Kolar and Cem Ilkel face off in the Semifinals at Vilnius on Hard.
Zdenek Kolar leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Zdenek Kolar is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Federico Cina (Jun 12).
Cem Ilkel is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Vladyslav Orlov (May 17).
Share this match
