WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Shenzhen
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Diyas
🪃 Counterpuncher
Blinkova
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 65% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 1,798 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Zarina Diyas here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Diyas | Blinkova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.98 |
| ROI % | - | -29.7% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.56u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Diyas
0
Blinkova
Jan 20, 2020
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 64
Jan 6, 2020
Shenzhen
H Hard · Round of 16
Jan 29, 2018
Taipei
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Diyas | Blinkova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 57.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 55.3% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 32.2% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 41.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 59.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 44.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Zarina Diyas and Anna Blinkova face off in the Round of 16 at Shenzhen on Hard.
Zarina Diyas leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Zarina Diyas is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Paula Badosa (Jan 19).
Anna Blinkova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Solana Sierra (Jun 21).
Share this match
