WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Guangzhou
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Putintseva
🎯 Baseliner
Baindl
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 510 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Yulia Putintseva here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Putintseva | Baindl |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–6 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.43 | - |
| ROI % | -13.8% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.52u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Putintseva
1
Baindl
Jul 12, 2021
Budapest
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Sep 17, 2018
Guangzhou
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Jan 29, 2018
Taipei
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Putintseva | Baindl |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 67.3% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 54.5% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 44.4% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.6 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 49.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 36.3% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.2% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Yulia Putintseva and Kateryna Baindl face off in the Quarterfinals at Guangzhou on Hard.
Yulia Putintseva leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Yulia Putintseva is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alicia Dudeney (Jun 13).
Kateryna Baindl is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Elisabetta Cocciaretto (Aug 26).
Share this match
