WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Rabat
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Bonaventure
⚙️ Grinder
Zidansek
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,848 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Tamara Zidansek here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Bonaventure | Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.25 |
| ROI % | - | -50.7% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.52u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Bonaventure
0
Zidansek
Jan 9, 2023
Hobart
H Hard · Round of 32
Apr 29, 2019
Rabat
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Bonaventure | Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Ysaline Bonaventure and Tamara Zidansek face off in the Round of 16 at Rabat on Clay.
Ysaline Bonaventure leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Ysaline Bonaventure is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Kathinka Von Deichmann (Jun 7).
Tamara Zidansek is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Zhuoxuan Bai (Jun 23).
Share this match
