ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Indianapolis
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Wu
⚙️ Grinder
Rybakov
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 🪃 Counterpuncher is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Yibing Wu plays Alex Rybakov.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Wu | Rybakov |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10–7 | 6–5 |
| Avg odds | 1.63 | 1.92 |
| ROI % | -11.9% | -2.9% |
| Units P/L | -2.02u | -0.32u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Wu
0
Rybakov
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Wu has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Rybakov's 25%).
| Opponent | Wu | Rybakov |
|---|---|---|
| Stefan Dostanic | W 61 46 63 | L 26 64 46 |
| Alex Bolt | L 67 26 | L 75 26 46 |
| Zachary Svajda | L 36 46 | L 26 67 |
| Andre Ilagan | W 16 62 61 | W 76 63 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Wu | Rybakov |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 58.6% | 66.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.1% | 70.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 55.3% | 45.7% |
| Aces / Match | 4.7 | 3.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.9 | 3.9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.8% | 55.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31% | 34.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 53.1% | 54.7% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 54.4% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 19.3 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.7 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 48.3% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.8% | 52.3% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Yibing Wu and Alex Rybakov face off in the Quarterfinals at Indianapolis on Hard.
Yibing Wu leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Yibing Wu is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jan Choinski (Jun 20).
Alex Rybakov is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bruno Kuzuhara (Jun 17).
Share this match
