WTA 250 · Semifinals · Gstaad
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Golubic
🎾 All-Court
Masarova
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
🎾 All-Court vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 641 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Viktorija Golubic plays Rebeka Masarova.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Golubic | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 12–6 | 8–4 |
| Avg odds | 3.40 | 2.60 |
| ROI % | +16.3% | +13.3% |
| Units P/L | +2.93u | +1.60u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Golubic
1
Masarova
Sep 18, 2023
Guangzhou
H Hard · Round of 16
Jul 11, 2016
Gstaad
C Clay · Semifinals
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Masarova has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Golubic's 0%).
| Opponent | Golubic | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Xin Yu Wang | L 64 46 46 | W 63 62 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Golubic | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 70.8% | 61.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 55.2% | 70.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 23.4% |
| Aces / Match | 0.5 | 4.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0.8 | 6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 44.8% | 49.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 43.8% | 32.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 64.7% | 40.7% |
| BP Converted % | 36.1% | 55% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51% | 44.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 67% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Viktorija Golubic and Rebeka Masarova face off in the Semifinals at Gstaad on Clay.
Viktorija Golubic leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Viktorija Golubic is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Emma Navarro (Jun 20).
Rebeka Masarova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jil Teichmann (Jun 23).
Share this match
