ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Rome 2
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ignatik
👑 The Complete Package
Daniel
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 1,398 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Taro Daniel here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Ignatik | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 18–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.11 |
| ROI % | - | +32.2% |
| Units P/L | - | +8.06u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Ignatik
0
Daniel
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Daniel has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Ignatik's 0%).
| Opponent | Ignatik | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| William Rejchtman Vinciguerra | L 36 00 | W 62 76 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Ignatik | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 61.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 66.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 52.1% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 65.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 31.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 49.4% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 41% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 24 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 26.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 70.1% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.3% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 81% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Uladzimir Ignatik and Taro Daniel face off in the Round of 32 at Rome 2 on Clay.
Uladzimir Ignatik leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Uladzimir Ignatik is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Mac Visser (Nov 10).
Taro Daniel is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Aleksandr Shevchenko (Jun 13).
Share this match
