ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Guangzhou
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schoolkate
🤖 Servebot
Hsu
🧱 The Wall
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 59% vs 🧱 The Wall across 2,304 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Tristan Schoolkate here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the wall's elite returner. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schoolkate | Hsu |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–8 | 5–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.89 | 2.02 |
| ROI % | -7.7% | +24.6% |
| Units P/L | -1.61u | +1.72u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Schoolkate
0
Hsu
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Schoolkate | Hsu | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 or more | 95% | 20/21 | 89% | 8/9 |
| 3 or more | 91% | 19/21 | 67% | 6/9 |
| 5 or more | 76% | 16/21 | 33% | 3/9 |
| 10 or more | 24% | 5/21 | 0% | 0/9 |
| 15 or more | 14% | 3/21 | 0% | 0/9 |
| 20 or more | 5% | 1/21 | 0% | 0/9 |
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Schoolkate has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Hsu's 30%).
| Opponent | Schoolkate | Hsu |
|---|---|---|
| Adam Walton | L 67 76 26 | L 26 75 26 |
| Facundo Mena | W 26 62 76 | L 57 67 |
| Omar Jasika | W 76 76 | W 64 57 63 |
| Coleman Wong | L 46 46 | L 46 67 |
| Murphy Cassone | W 64 76 | L 63 36 46 |
| Yi Zhou | L 67 46 | L 67 36 |
| Hugo Grenier | W 64 64 | L 26 26 |
| Harold Mayot | W 36 75 75 | L 46 26 |
| James McCabe | W 36 76 62 | W 64 60 |
| Jie Cui | L 46 26 | W 62 61 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schoolkate | Hsu |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 60.8% | 62.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 74.3% | 64.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 47% | 43.8% |
| Aces / Match | 7.7 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.7 | 3.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.2% | 55.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 22.3% | 30.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45% | 52% |
| BP Converted % | 32.5% | 33.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 23.4 | 22.3 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 30.5 | 41.7 |
| Net Pts Won % | 56.2% | 56.2% |
| Total Pts Won % | 46.9% | 48.2% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 57% | 67% |
Last five matches per player
Liam Broady
Gwangju Open · Round of 16
Apr 23
Hayato Matsuoka
Gwangju Open · Round of 32
Apr 21
Stefano Napolitano
Mexico City Open presentado por Banco BX+ · Quarterfinals
Apr 10
Marc Polmans
Mexico City Open presentado por Banco BX+ · Round of 16
Apr 8
Blaise Bicknell
Mexico City Open presentado por Banco BX+ · Round of 32
Apr 7
Mark Lajal
Gwangju Open · Round of 16
Apr 23
Adam Walton
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · Round of 32
Apr 13
Harry Wendelken
Koyushokucho Miyazaki Challenger · Quarterfinals
Apr 3
Omar Jasika
Koyushokucho Miyazaki Challenger · Round of 16
Apr 2
Renta Tokuda
Koyushokucho Miyazaki Challenger · Round of 32
Mar 30
Matchup overview
Tristan Schoolkate and Yu Hsiou Hsu face off in the Quarterfinals at Guangzhou on Hard.
Tristan Schoolkate leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Tristan Schoolkate is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Liam Broady (Apr 23).
Yu Hsiou Hsu is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Mark Lajal (Apr 23).
Share this match
