ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Bergamo
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Lamasine
🪃 Counterpuncher
Napolitano
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 4,242 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Stefano Napolitano here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Lamasine | Napolitano |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 8–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.47 |
| ROI % | - | -4.6% |
| Units P/L | - | -0.55u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Lamasine
0
Napolitano
Feb 27, 2019
Pau
H Hard · Round of 32
Feb 17, 2019
Bergamo
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Jan 6, 2016
Noumea
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Lamasine | Napolitano |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 57.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 45.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 5.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 4.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 61.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 29.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 43.5% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 44.6% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 29 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 36 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 75% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47.3% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tristan Lamasine and Stefano Napolitano face off in the Quarterfinals at Bergamo on Hard.
Tristan Lamasine leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Tristan Lamasine is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marat Sharipov (Jul 14).
Stefano Napolitano is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Daniel Rincon (Jun 17).
Share this match
