ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Shenzhen
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Lamasine
🪃 Counterpuncher
Fucsovics
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 53% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 1,829 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Marton Fucsovics here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Lamasine | Fucsovics |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.64 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -5.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Lamasine
0
Fucsovics
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Lamasine | Fucsovics |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 61.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 71.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 49.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 5.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 5.4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 62.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 24.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 44% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 29.4% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 21.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 28.5 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 75.4% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 48% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tristan Lamasine and Marton Fucsovics face off in the Round of 16 at Shenzhen on Hard.
Tristan Lamasine leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Tristan Lamasine is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marat Sharipov (Jul 14).
Marton Fucsovics is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Brandon Nakashima (Jun 16).
Share this match
