ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Blois
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Lamasine
🪃 Counterpuncher
Schepper
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Tristan Lamasine plays Kenny De Schepper.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Lamasine | Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–3 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.94 |
| ROI % | - | -61.3% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.45u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Lamasine
2
Schepper
Oct 16, 2022
Hamburg
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 13, 2018
Blois
C Clay · Round of 16
May 1, 2017
Estoril
C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 1, 2016
Montpellier
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Lamasine | Schepper |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 65.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 64.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 35.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 4.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 26.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 45.6% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 46.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 16 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 30 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 58.8% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 44.9% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 25% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tristan Lamasine and Kenny De Schepper face off in the Round of 16 at Blois on Clay.
Tristan Lamasine leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Tristan Lamasine is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marat Sharipov (Jul 14).
Kenny De Schepper is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Max Alcala Gurri (Jun 7).
Share this match
