ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Rome 2
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Lamasine
🪃 Counterpuncher
Ymer
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Tristan Lamasine plays Elias Ymer.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Lamasine | Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 6–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.55 |
| ROI % | - | -9.2% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.01u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Lamasine
0
Ymer
Sep 30, 2016
Rome 2
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Feb 10, 2016
Bergamo
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Lamasine | Ymer |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 61.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 71.9% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48.4% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 3.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 48.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 25.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 48.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 42.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 16.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 24.8 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 66.6% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 49.2% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tristan Lamasine and Elias Ymer face off in the Quarterfinals at Rome 2 on Clay.
Tristan Lamasine leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Tristan Lamasine is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marat Sharipov (Jul 14).
Elias Ymer is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ugo Humbert (Jun 8).
Share this match
