Timofey SkatovvsRaphael Collignon

August 9, 2025C Clay

Match Result

Final score & match stats

#176Timofey Skatov

647

#51Raphael Collignon[2]

465

SkatovCollignon

1st Serve %52%56%

1st Serve Won67%67%

2nd Serve Won50%53%

Serve Pts Won59%61%

BP Saved7/115/10

Return Pts Won39%41%

Total Pts Won50%50%

Winners2637

Unforced Errors4844

Aces26

Double Faults911

Archetype Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Skatov

⚙️ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Collignon

🤖 Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve

Matchup analysis

The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Raphael Collignon here.

Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

Metric	Skatov	Collignon
W-L	11–11	13–4
Avg odds	2.17	1.66
ROI %	-11.6%	+19.9%
Units P/L	-2.56u	+3.39u

Head-to-Head

Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting

Skatov

Collignon

Aug 9, 2025

Bonn

C Clay · Semifinals

Skatov

Full head-to-head & rivalry stats

Common Opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Collignon has a higher win rate against shared opponents (75% vs Skatov's 25%).

Opponent	Skatov	Collignon
Titouan Droguet	L 26 16	W 62 76
Luca Van Assche	L 16 46	W 64 60
Norbert Gombos	W 63 61	W 75 62
Alexander Blockx	L 46 57	L 36 46

Mechanics

Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days

Stat	Skatov	Collignon
Serve
1st Serve In %	61.6%	67.1%
1st Serve Pts Won %	68.8%	76.7%
2nd Serve Pts Won %	52.3%	55.5%
Aces / Match	4.7	5.9
Double Faults / Match	3.1	3.3
Break Points Saved %	54.5%	62.5%
Return
1st Return Pts Won %	34.1%	34.4%
2nd Return Pts Won %	54.1%	47.6%
BP Converted %	40.1%	42.1%
Rally
Winners / Match	31.7	20.8
Unforced Errors / Match	28.2	21.3
Net Pts Won %	77.8%	75%
Total Pts Won %	52.1%	54.4%
Surface (Clay)
Clay Win %	53%	79%