ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Granby
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Atmane
🤖 Servebot
Maloney
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 1,398 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Terence Atmane here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Atmane | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–10 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.47 | - |
| ROI % | -30.6% | - |
| Units P/L | -4.59u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Atmane
0
Maloney
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Maloney has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Atmane's 0%).
| Opponent | Atmane | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| James Duckworth | L 67 26 | W 62 76 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Atmane | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.8% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 78.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 52.1% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 6.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.2 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 23% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45.9% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 33.2% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.9 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.3 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 74% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Terence Atmane and Patrick Maloney face off in the Round of 32 at Granby on Hard.
Terence Atmane leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Terence Atmane is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gabriel Diallo (Jun 22).
Patrick Maloney is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Blaise Bicknell (Sep 22).
Share this match
