ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Guangzhou
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Atmane
🤖 Servebot
Sharipov
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
Both Terence Atmane and Marat Sharipov are 🤖 Servebot types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 13,712 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Atmane | Sharipov |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–10 | 9–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.47 | 1.63 |
| ROI % | -30.6% | -7.7% |
| Units P/L | -4.59u | -1.00u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Atmane
0
Sharipov
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Atmane and Sharipov posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Atmane | Sharipov |
|---|---|---|
| Omar Jasika | W 75 64 | W 64 61 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Atmane | Sharipov |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.8% | 57.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 78.4% | 72.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 52.1% | 46.4% |
| Aces / Match | 6.8 | 7.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54% | 55.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 23% | 25.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45.9% | 44.3% |
| BP Converted % | 33.2% | 29.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.9 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.3 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 74% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.6% | 47.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 73% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Terence Atmane and Marat Sharipov face off in the Round of 16 at Guangzhou on Hard.
Terence Atmane leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Terence Atmane is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gabriel Diallo (Jun 22).
Marat Sharipov is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Andrey Chepelev (Jun 13).
Share this match
