ATP Masters 1000 · Round of 128 · ATP Masters 1000 Shanghai
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Atmane
🤖 Servebot
Thompson
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
Both Terence Atmane and Jordan Thompson are 🤖 Servebot types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 13,712 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Atmane | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–10 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.47 | - |
| ROI % | -30.6% | - |
| Units P/L | -4.59u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Atmane
0
Thompson
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Atmane has a higher win rate against shared opponents (67% vs Thompson's 0%).
| Opponent | Atmane | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Nuno Borges | L 46 46 | L 76 36 26 46 |
| Ugo Humbert | W 76 76 | L 36 67 |
| Taylor Fritz | W 36 75 63 | L 16 03 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Atmane | Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.8% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 78.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 52.1% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 6.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.2 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 23% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 45.9% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 33.2% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 22.9 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.3 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 74% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Terence Atmane and Jordan Thompson face off in the Round of 128 at ATP Masters 1000 Shanghai on Hard.
Terence Atmane leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Terence Atmane is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Gabriel Diallo (Jun 22).
Jordan Thompson is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Nuno Borges (Jan 21).
Share this match
