ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Mersin
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Daniel
🤖 Servebot
Lamasine
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 4,477 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Taro Daniel here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Daniel | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 18–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.11 | - |
| ROI % | +32.2% | - |
| Units P/L | +8.06u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Daniel
0
Lamasine
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Daniel and Lamasine posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Daniel | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Marat Sharipov | L 67 61 46 | L 67 67 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Daniel | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.8% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 52.1% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 65.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.5% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 49.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 41% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 24 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.9 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 70.1% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.3% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 81% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Taro Daniel and Tristan Lamasine face off in the Round of 16 at Mersin on Clay.
Taro Daniel leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Taro Daniel is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Federico Cina (Jun 13).
Tristan Lamasine is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marat Sharipov (Jul 14).
Share this match
