ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Como
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Daniel
💥 Big Hitter
Safwat
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 57% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 4,489 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Taro Daniel here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Daniel | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 18–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.14 | - |
| ROI % | +33.8% | - |
| Units P/L | +8.45u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
3
Daniel
1
Safwat
Jan 31, 2020
Burnie
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Sep 4, 2019
Genova
C Clay · Round of 32
Jan 2, 2017
Doha
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 1, 2016
Como
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Daniel | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.1% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 67.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 52.3% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 66% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 49.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 39% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 23.4 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 27 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 73.1% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 82% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Taro Daniel and Mohamed Safwat face off in the Round of 16 at Como on Clay.
Taro Daniel leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Taro Daniel is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Federico Cina (Jun 13).
Mohamed Safwat is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ivan Gretskiy (Sep 1).
Share this match
