WTA 250 · Semifinals · Bogota
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zidansek
🪃 Counterpuncher
Tomova
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 65% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,848 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Tamara Zidansek here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zidansek | Tomova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–2 | 1–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.25 | 2.75 |
| ROI % | -50.7% | -66.6% |
| Units P/L | -1.52u | -3.33u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Zidansek
0
Tomova
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Zidansek | Tomova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 62.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 61% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 47% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 61.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 40.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 43.6% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 39.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 48.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 40% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tamara Zidansek and Viktoriya Tomova face off in the Semifinals at Bogota on Clay.
Tamara Zidansek leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Tamara Zidansek is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Zhuoxuan Bai (Jun 23).
Viktoriya Tomova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hayu Kinoshita (Jun 23).
Share this match
