WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Bucharest
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zidansek
🪃 Counterpuncher
Peterson
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 53% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 5,392 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Rebecca Peterson here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zidansek | Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–2 | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | 2.25 | 1.29 |
| ROI % | -50.7% | -56.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.52u | -1.68u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Zidansek
0
Peterson
Jan 6, 2020
Auckland
H Hard · Round of 32
Jul 16, 2018
Bucharest
C Clay · Round of 32
Feb 9, 2018
Fed Cup G1 RR: SLO vs SWE
H Hard · Round Robin
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Zidansek | Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 61.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 39.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 52.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 68.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 53% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 48.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tamara Zidansek and Rebecca Peterson face off in the Round of 32 at Bucharest on Clay.
Tamara Zidansek leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Tamara Zidansek is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Zhuoxuan Bai (Jun 23).
Rebecca Peterson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Fetecau (May 11).
Share this match
