WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Seoul
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zidansek
🪃 Counterpuncher
Hercog
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs 🎯 Baseliner is historically tight (50% vs 50%, 320 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Tamara Zidansek plays Polona Hercog.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Zidansek
0
Hercog
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Zidansek | Hercog |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tamara Zidansek and Polona Hercog face off in the Round of 32 at Seoul on Hard.
Tamara Zidansek leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Tamara Zidansek is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Veronika Erjavec (Feb 1).
Polona Hercog is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Emma Raducanu (Oct 25).
Share this match
