WTA 500 · Quarterfinals · Adelaide 2
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zidansek
🪃 Counterpuncher
Davis
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 65% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,848 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Tamara Zidansek here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zidansek | Davis |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–2 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.25 | - |
| ROI % | -50.7% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.52u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Zidansek
1
Davis
Jan 2, 2023
Auckland
H Hard · Round of 32
Jan 10, 2022
Adelaide 2
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Zidansek | Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tamara Zidansek and Lauren Davis face off in the Quarterfinals at Adelaide 2 on Hard.
Tamara Zidansek leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Tamara Zidansek is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Zhuoxuan Bai (Jun 23).
Lauren Davis is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Eleejah Inisan (Jun 9).
Share this match
