WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Moscow
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zidansek
🪃 Counterpuncher
Siegemund
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 60% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 897 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Laura Siegemund here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zidansek | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–2 | 5–8 |
| Avg odds | 2.25 | 3.26 |
| ROI % | -50.7% | -33.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.52u | -4.29u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Zidansek
1
Siegemund
Apr 18, 2022
Stuttgart
C Clay · Round of 32
Jul 23, 2018
Moscow
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Zidansek | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 75.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 55.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 38.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 60.8% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 52.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Tamara Zidansek and Laura Siegemund face off in the Quarterfinals at Moscow on Clay.
Tamara Zidansek leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Tamara Zidansek is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Zhuoxuan Bai (Jun 23).
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (Jun 23).
Share this match
