WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Cleveland
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Gibson
💥 Big Hitter
Minnen
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 702 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Talia Gibson here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Gibson | Minnen |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–2 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.86 | - |
| ROI % | -4.8% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.19u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Gibson
0
Minnen
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Gibson has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Minnen's 0%).
| Opponent | Gibson | Minnen |
|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | W 75 64 | L 36 46 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Gibson | Minnen |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 60.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 66.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.1 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 61.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.9% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 45% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 78% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Talia Gibson and Greet Minnen face off in the Round of 32 at Cleveland on Hard.
Talia Gibson leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Talia Gibson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Magdalena Frech (May 17).
Greet Minnen is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Emma Raducanu (Feb 1).
Share this match
