WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Istanbul
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kuznetsova
💥 Big Hitter
Tomova
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,716 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Svetlana Kuznetsova here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kuznetsova | Tomova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.75 |
| ROI % | - | -66.6% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.33u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Kuznetsova
0
Tomova
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kuznetsova | Tomova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 62.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 61% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 47% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 61.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 40.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 43.6% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 39.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 48.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 40% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Svetlana Kuznetsova and Viktoriya Tomova face off in the Round of 16 at Istanbul on Clay.
Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Svetlana Kuznetsova is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove (Jun 28).
Viktoriya Tomova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hayu Kinoshita (Jun 23).
Share this match
