WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Montreal
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Lamens
🎾 All-Court
Maia
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs 🎾 All-Court across 878 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Beatriz Haddad Maia here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Lamens | Maia |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–1 | 0–7 |
| Avg odds | 2.94 | 3.16 |
| ROI % | -41.5% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -0.83u | -7.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Lamens
0
Maia
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Lamens | Maia |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 66.2% | 67.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.3% | 55.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 41.4% | 32.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0.5 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.5 | 6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 55.8% | 50% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 47.9% | 29.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 63.9% | 48.4% |
| BP Converted % | 74.7% | 21.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 57.2% | 42.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Suzan Lamens and Beatriz Haddad Maia face off in the Round of 64 at Montreal on Hard.
Suzan Lamens leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Suzan Lamens is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Anastasia Potapova (Jun 10).
Beatriz Haddad Maia is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hope Watson (Jun 7).
Share this match
