ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Braunschweig
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nagal
🧱 The Wall
Safwat
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 54% vs 🧱 The Wall across 2,061 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Mohamed Safwat here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the the wall's elite returner. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Nagal | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4–9 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.33 | - |
| ROI % | +18.5% | - |
| Units P/L | +2.41u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Nagal
1
Safwat
Jul 7, 2021
Braunschweig
C Clay · Round of 32
Jan 20, 2020
Australian Open
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Nagal | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 69.2% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64.5% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.2% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.9 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.8 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 49.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 51.3% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 19.5 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 27 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 52.3% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 20% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sumit Nagal and Mohamed Safwat face off in the Round of 32 at Braunschweig on Clay.
Sumit Nagal leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Sumit Nagal is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Duje Ajdukovic (Jun 25).
Mohamed Safwat is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ivan Gretskiy (Sep 1).
Share this match
