ATP Challenger Tour · Semifinals · Nonthaburi 3
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Parker
🪃 Counterpuncher
Shimabukuro
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 53% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 1,829 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Sho Shimabukuro here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Parker | Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 9–8 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.22 |
| ROI % | - | -4.2% |
| Units P/L | - | -0.72u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Parker
1
Shimabukuro
Jun 9, 2024
Nottingham 2
G Grass · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 10, 2022
Nonthaburi 3
H Hard · Semifinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Parker | Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 59% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 76.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 54.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 7.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 60.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 32.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 50.9% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 50.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 26.2 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 19.6 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 75.5% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 53.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 60% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Stuart Parker and Sho Shimabukuro face off in the Semifinals at Nonthaburi 3 on Hard.
Stuart Parker leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Stuart Parker is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Stefano Travaglia (Nov 4).
Sho Shimabukuro is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Frances Tiafoe (Jun 17).
Share this match
