ITF W · Klosters ITF
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Luescher
🏃 Pusher
Havermans
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 64% vs 🏃 Pusher across 1,287 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Danique Havermans here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Luescher | Havermans |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–0 | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | 3.80 | 1.47 |
| ROI % | +279.5% | -64.3% |
| Units P/L | +5.59u | -1.93u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Luescher
0
Havermans
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Luescher | Havermans |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 68.4% | 57.1% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.1% | 49.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50% | 33.9% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 8 | 8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 40% | 45.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.2% | 42.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48% | 58.8% |
| BP Converted % | 75% | 47.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 44.4% | 45.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 100% | 25% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sophie Luescher and Danique Havermans face off in the match at Klosters ITF on Clay.
Sophie Luescher leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Sophie Luescher is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Danique Havermans (Jun 15).
Danique Havermans is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sophie Luescher (Jun 15).
Share this match
