Grand Slam · Round of 32 · Roland Garros
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Pironkova
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 510 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Tsvetana Pironkova here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stephens | Pironkova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.74 | - |
| ROI % | -68.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Stephens
1
Pironkova
May 23, 2016
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 32
May 25, 2015
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Stephens | Pironkova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 39.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 17% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sloane Stephens and Tsvetana Pironkova face off in the Round of 32 at Roland Garros on Clay.
Sloane Stephens leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Tsvetana Pironkova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Daria Kasatkina (Aug 30).
Share this match
