WTA 1000 · Round of 128 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Podoroska
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 68% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 437 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Nadia Podoroska here.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stephens | Podoroska |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–4 | 13–3 |
| Avg odds | 3.74 | 2.19 |
| ROI % | -68.2% | +86.1% |
| Units P/L | -3.41u | +13.77u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Stephens
0
Podoroska
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Stephens | Podoroska |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.6% | 67.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 62.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0.8 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 4.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 47.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.1% | 45.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 39.4% | 56.2% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 58% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.1% | 53.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 17% | 78% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sloane Stephens and Nadia Podoroska face off in the Round of 128 at Rome on Clay.
Sloane Stephens leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Nadia Podoroska is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Lucciana Perez Alarcon (Jun 19).
Share this match
