WTA 500 · Quarterfinals · Washington
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Chirico
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,848 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Louisa Chirico here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stephens | Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.74 | - |
| ROI % | -68.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Stephens
0
Chirico
Apr 3, 2023
Charleston
C Clay · Round of 64
Feb 22, 2016
Acapulco
H Hard · Round of 32
Aug 3, 2015
Washington
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Stephens | Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 39.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sloane Stephens and Louisa Chirico face off in the Quarterfinals at Washington on Hard.
Sloane Stephens leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Louisa Chirico is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Carolina Alves (Feb 2).
Share this match
