WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Cleveland
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Davis
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
Both Sloane Stephens and Lauren Davis are ⚙️ Grinder types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 1,750 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stephens | Davis |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.74 | - |
| ROI % | -68.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 5 career meetings
2
Stephens
3
Davis
Aug 21, 2023
Cleveland
H Hard · Round of 32
Jul 31, 2023
Washington
H Hard · Round of 32
Jan 9, 2023
Hobart
H Hard · Round of 32
Jun 29, 2015
Wimbledon
G Grass · Round of 64
Jan 5, 2015
Auckland
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Stephens | Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 39.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sloane Stephens and Lauren Davis face off in the Round of 32 at Cleveland on Hard.
Sloane Stephens leads 2-3 over 5 previous meetings.
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Lauren Davis is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Eleejah Inisan (Jun 9).
Share this match
