WTA 500 · Round of 16 · Charleston
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Saville
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 68% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 437 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Daria Saville here.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stephens | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.74 | - |
| ROI % | -68.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Stephens
0
Saville
Feb 21, 2022
Guadalajara
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Apr 4, 2016
Charleston
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Stephens | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 39.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 17% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sloane Stephens and Daria Saville face off in the Round of 16 at Charleston on Clay.
Sloane Stephens leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Daria Saville is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Madison Keys (May 26).
Share this match
