WTA 250 · Semifinals · Auckland
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Wozniacki
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 67% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,444 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Caroline Wozniacki here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Stephens | Wozniacki |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.74 | - |
| ROI % | -68.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Stephens
1
Wozniacki
Aug 7, 2017
Toronto
H Hard · Semifinals
Jan 4, 2016
Auckland
H Hard · Semifinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Stephens | Wozniacki |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.6% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 48.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0.8 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.3 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.2% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 25.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 39.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 49.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 40.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Sloane Stephens and Caroline Wozniacki face off in the Semifinals at Auckland on Hard.
Sloane Stephens leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Caroline Wozniacki is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Renata Zarazua (Aug 26).
Share this match
