ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Karshi
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Betov
⚙️ Grinder
Ignatik
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 👑 The Complete Package is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Sergey Betov plays Uladzimir Ignatik.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Betov | Ignatik |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 6.43 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Betov
0
Ignatik
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Betov | Ignatik |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 50.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 40.8% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 2.7 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.7 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 38.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 18.5% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 33.8% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 22.2% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 41.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Tomohiro Masabayashi
KARNATAKA OPEN · 1st Round Qualifying
May 10
Vladyslav Orlov
Shymkent Challenger 1 · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 19
Yusuke Takahashi
WUNING OPEN 1 · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 5
Tung-Lin Wu
Fujairah Open · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 2
Ergi Kirkin
M15 Monastir · Round of 32
Feb 16
Matchup overview
Sergey Betov and Uladzimir Ignatik face off in the Quarterfinals at Karshi on Hard.
Sergey Betov leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Sergey Betov is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Tomohiro Masabayashi (May 10).
Uladzimir Ignatik is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Mac Visser (Nov 10).
Share this match
