WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Williams
💥 Big Hitter
Friedsam
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
Both Serena Williams and Anna Lena Friedsam are 💥 Big Hitter types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 6,968 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Williams | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.45 |
| ROI % | - | -29.4% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.47u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Williams
0
Friedsam
May 9, 2016
Rome
C Clay · Round of 32
May 25, 2015
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Williams | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 72.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50.5% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 48.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 35.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 52.2% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 28.6% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 69% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Serena Williams and Anna Lena Friedsam face off in the Round of 32 at Rome on Clay.
Serena Williams leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Serena Williams is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Anett Kontaveit (Aug 29).
Anna Lena Friedsam is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Clervie Ngounoue (Jun 23).
Share this match
