WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Williams
💥 Big Hitter
Pavlyuchenkova
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🤖 Servebot is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Serena Williams plays Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Williams | Pavlyuchenkova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.38 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Williams
0
Pavlyuchenkova
Jun 27, 2016
Wimbledon
G Grass · Quarterfinals
May 11, 2015
Rome
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Williams | Pavlyuchenkova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 57.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 50% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 24.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 61.9% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 16.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 42.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Serena Williams and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova face off in the Round of 32 at Rome on Clay.
Serena Williams leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Serena Williams is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Anett Kontaveit (Aug 29).
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alexandra Eala (Apr 21).
Share this match
