WTA 1000 Β· Round of 32 Β· Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Williams
π₯ Big Hitter
Pavlyuchenkova
π€ Servebot
Matchup analysis
π₯ Big Hitter vs π€ Servebot is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 4,452 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Serena Williams plays Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Williams | Pavlyuchenkova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0β1 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.38 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores Β· 2 career meetings
2
Williams
0
Pavlyuchenkova
Jun 27, 2016
Wimbledon
G Grass Β· Quarterfinals
May 11, 2015
Rome
C Clay Β· Round of 32
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Williams | Pavlyuchenkova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 57.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 50% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 24.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 61.9% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 16.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 42.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Serena Williams and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova face off in the Round of 32 at Rome on Clay.
Serena Williams leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Serena Williams is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Anett Kontaveit (Aug 29).
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alexandra Eala (Apr 21).
Share this match