ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Tigre 1
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Taverna
🎾 All-Court
Casanova
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 62% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 764 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Santiago Rodriguez Taverna here.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Taverna | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–3 | 7–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.61 | 2.17 |
| ROI % | -16.5% | +4.9% |
| Units P/L | -0.99u | +0.54u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
4
Taverna
0
Casanova
Oct 25, 2022
Lima 2
C Clay · Round of 32
Jan 7, 2022
Tigre 1
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Nov 15, 2021
Campinas
C Clay · 2nd Round Qualifying
Feb 26, 2018
Punta del Este
C Clay · 2nd Round Qualifying
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Casanova has a higher win rate against shared opponents (67% vs Taverna's 0%).
| Opponent | Taverna | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Maxime Janvier | L 16 67 | W 63 61 |
| Juan Manuel La Serna | L 67 36 | W 60 06 76 |
| Roman Andres Burruchaga | L 57 76 26 | L 36 46 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Taverna | Casanova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.8% | 69.1% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 64.9% | 55.9% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.5% | 43.8% |
| Aces / Match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.4 | 1.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.7% | 48.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.9% | 37.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46% | 51.7% |
| BP Converted % | 37.4% | 44.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 23.6 | 17.9 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 35.4 | 36.5 |
| Net Pts Won % | 59.8% | 69.1% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48.3% | 46.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Ignacio Parisca Romera
CIT Open · Round of 32
Jun 16
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 16
Jun 11
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
CIT Open · Round of 16
Jun 11
Karim Bennani
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 32
Jun 9
Adrian Boitan
CAME CUP 2026 CITTA' DI CERVIA · Round of 32
May 18
Juan Estevez
CIT Open · Round of 16
Jun 17
Guido Ivan Justo
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 16
Jun 11
Samuel Heredia
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion San Miguel de Tucuman · Round of 32
Jun 10
Hernando Jose Escurra Isnardi
CIT Open · Round of 32
Jun 8
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion Córdoba · Round of 32
May 12
Matchup overview
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna and Hernan Casanova face off in the Quarterfinals at Tigre 1 on Clay.
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna leads 4-0 over 4 previous meetings.
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Ignacio Parisca Romera (Jun 16).
Hernan Casanova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Juan Estevez (Jun 17).
Share this match
