WTA 1000 Β· Round of 128 Β· Miami
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Peterson
π₯ Big Hitter
Siegemund
πΉ Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
π₯ Big Hitter vs πΉ Frontrunner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 1,273 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Rebecca Peterson plays Laura Siegemund.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Peterson | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1β2 | 5β8 |
| Avg odds | 1.29 | 3.26 |
| ROI % | -56.0% | -33.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.68u | -4.29u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores Β· 1 career meeting
1
Peterson
0
Siegemund
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Peterson | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.7% | 75.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58.7% | 55.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 39.3% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 9 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.5% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.8% | 38.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 68.1% | 60.8% |
| BP Converted % | 53% | 52.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48.5% | 50.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Rebecca Peterson and Laura Siegemund face off in the Round of 128 at Miami on Hard.
Rebecca Peterson leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Rebecca Peterson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Fetecau (May 11).
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (Jun 23).
Share this match