WTA 1000 · Round of 128 · Miami
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Peterson
💥 Big Hitter
Siegemund
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🏹 Frontrunner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 1,273 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Rebecca Peterson plays Laura Siegemund.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Peterson | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–2 | 5–8 |
| Avg odds | 1.29 | 3.26 |
| ROI % | -56.0% | -33.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.68u | -4.29u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Peterson
0
Siegemund
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Peterson | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.7% | 75.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58.7% | 55.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 39.3% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 9 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.5% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37.8% | 38.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 68.1% | 60.8% |
| BP Converted % | 53% | 52.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48.5% | 50.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Rebecca Peterson and Laura Siegemund face off in the Round of 128 at Miami on Hard.
Rebecca Peterson leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Rebecca Peterson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Fetecau (May 11).
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (Jun 23).
Share this match
