WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Charleston
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zheng
👑 The Complete Package
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 77% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 713 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Qinwen Zheng here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zheng | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–0 | 1–3 |
| Avg odds | 1.38 | 2.37 |
| ROI % | +38.0% | -60.3% |
| Units P/L | +0.38u | -2.41u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Zheng
0
Stephens
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Zheng | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 54.9% | 67.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 75.2% | 53% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 46.2% | 47.3% |
| Aces / Match | 9.2 | 0.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.7 | 2.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 52.4% | 57.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.9% | 26.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 53.6% | 42.3% |
| BP Converted % | 52.2% | 58.4% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.8% | 43% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 60% | 25% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Qinwen Zheng and Sloane Stephens face off in the Round of 64 at Charleston on Clay.
Qinwen Zheng leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Qinwen Zheng is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Anna Bondar (May 5).
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Veronika Podrez (Apr 13).
Share this match
