WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Istanbul
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Martic
🤖 Servebot
Zidansek
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 2,103 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Petra Martic here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Martic | Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.33 |
| ROI % | - | -26.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -0.52u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
3
Martic
1
Zidansek
Apr 13, 2022
BJK Cup G1 RR: CRO vs SLO
C Clay · Round Robin
Mar 7, 2022
Indian Wells
H Hard · Round of 64
Aug 26, 2019
Us Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Apr 22, 2019
Istanbul
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Martic | Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Petra Martic and Tamara Zidansek face off in the Round of 32 at Istanbul on Clay.
Petra Martic leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Petra Martic is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Diane Parry (Jun 30).
Tamara Zidansek is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Nuria Brancaccio (Jun 11).
Share this match
