ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Challenger de Santiago - Dove Men Care
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Dias
⚔️ The Gladiator
Silva
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 54% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 3,800 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Dias | Silva |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–8 | 8–5 |
| Avg odds | 2.03 | 1.65 |
| ROI % | -17.8% | -8.5% |
| Units P/L | -3.02u | -1.10u |
Prior meetings and scores · 5 career meetings
2
Dias
3
Silva
Apr 13, 2026
Tallahassee Tennis Challenger
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Mar 11, 2026
Challenger de Santiago - Dove Men Care
C Clay · Round of 16
Mar 27, 2025
Concepcion
C Clay · Round of 16
Jun 13, 2024
Lima 1
C Clay · Round of 16
May 3, 2023
Coquimbo
C Clay · Round of 16
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Dias has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Silva's 50%).
| Opponent | Dias | Silva |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Barrena | W 63 62 | W 63 36 63 |
| Lautaro Midon | L 26 16 | L 67 16 |
| Elmer Moller | W 62 63 | L 57 26 |
| Gustavo Heide | L 67 26 | L 26 16 |
| Liam Draxl | L 76 46 67 | W 63 75 |
| Genaro Alberto Olivieri | W 46 64 63 | W 63 64 |
| Franco Roncadelli | W 63 62 | L 64 16 26 |
| Henrique Rocha | L 16 26 | L 26 46 |
| Gonzalo Bueno | W 76 62 | W 64 63 |
| Valerio Aboian | W 76 76 | W 63 63 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Dias | Silva |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 55.6% | 65.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 67.1% | 65.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 44.4% | 53.5% |
| Aces / Match | 2.2 | 3.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.2 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 40.3% | 46.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.9% | 35.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 49% | 47.1% |
| BP Converted % | 39.5% | 43.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 18.3 | 21.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 32.6 | 36.6 |
| Net Pts Won % | 59.7% | 55.5% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48.1% | 50.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 55% | 59% |
Last five matches per player
Maxim Mrva
Unicredit Czech Open · Round of 16
Jun 3
Chun-Hsin Tseng
Internazionali Di Tennis - Citta'Di Vicenza · Round of 32
May 26
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying
May 24
Alexis Galarneau
Roland Garros · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 20
Alex Rybakov
Tallahassee Tennis Challenger · Round of 16
Apr 15
Diego Dedura
Neckarcup 2.0 · Round of 16
Jun 4
Alex Barrena
Neckarcup 2.0 · Round of 32
Jun 3
Vilius Gaubas
Roland Garros · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 24
Calvin Hemery
Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying
May 24
Lautaro Midon
Internazionali Di Tennis - Citta'Di Vicenza · Round of 32
May 13
Match summary
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva and Pedro Boscardin Dias will meet in the quarterfinals of the Tallahassee Tennis Challenger on outdoor clay on April 17, 2026. Reis Da Silva holds the 211 ranking while Boscardin Dias sits at 229, making this a close matchup between two players in similar territory on the circuit.
These two have split their head to head meetings evenly at 2-2 across four total encounters. Their rivalry has been competitive and balanced, with neither player establishing clear dominance over the other.
Boscardin Dias has been in strong form recently, winning 4 of his last 5 matches and 7 of his last 10, with a current winning streak of two. He's also played more frequently, with six matches in the last 14 days. Reis Da Silva has had a mixed recent stretch, winning 2 of his last 5 matches and 5 of his last 10, though he does carry a two match winning streak into this quarterfinal.
On clay, Boscardin Dias has posted a 65% win rate in recent play and tends to be an aggressive, relentless competitor. Reis Da Silva maintains a 55% record on the surface and typically plays a more defensive, retrieving style. Both approaches can work on clay depending on execution and point construction.
Share this match
