ITF M25 · Round of 32 · M25 Champaign IL
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Jubb
👑 The Complete Package
Tajima
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,090 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Paul Jubb plays Naoki Tajima.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Jubb | Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–6 | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.62 | 1.73 |
| ROI % | -26.3% | -64.7% |
| Units P/L | -2.89u | -1.94u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Jubb
0
Tajima
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Jubb | Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.4% | 56.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.3% | 68.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.2% | 46.6% |
| Aces / Match | 5 | 5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.7 | 2.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 56.6% | 34% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 34.6% | 32.7% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48% | 45.1% |
| BP Converted % | 53.9% | 32.5% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 21.8 | 34 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 47.5 | 25 |
| Net Pts Won % | 68.2% | 63.6% |
| Total Pts Won % | 49.3% | 48.7% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 57% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Rio Noguchi
Dublin Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 14
Tristan Schoolkate
Lexus Ilkley Open · Round of 32
Jun 10
Mark Lajal
Lexus Ilkley Open · 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 8
Max Basing
Lexus Ilkley Open · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 8
Patrick Brady
M25 Nottingham · Round of 32
May 4
Matchup overview
Paul Jubb and Naoki Tajima face off in the Round of 32 at M25 Champaign IL on Hard.
Paul Jubb leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Paul Jubb is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Rio Noguchi (Jun 14).
Naoki Tajima is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Dinko Dinev (Jun 22).
Share this match
